{"id":19998,"date":"2026-03-15T01:41:02","date_gmt":"2026-03-15T05:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/new-jersey-tiktoker-faces-widespread-criticism-after-claiming-black-people-created-slavery\/"},"modified":"2026-03-15T01:41:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-15T05:41:06","slug":"new-jersey-tiktoker-faces-widespread-criticism-after-claiming-black-people-created-slavery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/new-jersey-tiktoker-faces-widespread-criticism-after-claiming-black-people-created-slavery\/","title":{"rendered":"New Jersey TikToker Faces Widespread Criticism After Claiming Black People Created Slavery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A New Jersey-based TikTok content creator has ignited a fierce online controversy after posting a video containing what she described as her &#8220;most controversial views,&#8221; with one specific claim about the origins of slavery drawing widespread condemnation and sparking a heated debate about historical interpretation, racism, and the spread of misinformation on social media platforms.<\/p>\n<h2>The Viral Video and Its Immediate Fallout<\/h2>\n<p>Athena Karvellas initially posted the video on March 2, presenting a series of political opinions. Among statements about armed security in schools and the place of Islam in Western society, she made an assertion that rapidly became the focal point of public outrage. &#8220;I&#8217;m tired of Black people pretending like they are the ones that didn&#8217;t start slavery, because they were,&#8221; Karvellas stated in the clip. She continued, &#8220;And I&#8217;m tired of them pretending that White people didn&#8217;t die to end slavery, because we were.&#8221; She further claimed that modern-day slave owners are predominantly &#8220;people of color&#8221; and suggested that some in the Black community avoid these &#8220;truths&#8221; to circumvent hard work.<\/p>\n<h3>Historical Context and Expert Rebuttal<\/h3>\n<p>The backlash was swift and rooted in historical scholarship. Historians and educators quickly pointed out that slavery is an ancient institution that predates recorded history, appearing in various forms across countless civilizations including Mesopotamia, Greece, Rome, and numerous African kingdoms long before European contact. The specific system challenged by Karvellas&#8217;s statement\u2014the transatlantic slave trade\u2014was a racialized, commercial enterprise established by European colonial powers beginning in the 15th century. This system was distinct in its scale, its justification through pseudoscientific racism, and its creation of a hereditary, race-based caste of enslaved people, primarily from West and Central Africa, in the Americas.<\/p>\n<p>The New York Times and other historical sources detail how this trade was orchestrated by European and later American slavers, who financed, sailed, and insured the voyages, and established the legal and economic frameworks in the colonies to maintain the system. While some African elites participated in capturing and selling prisoners of war or others to European traders on the coast, they did not create the transatlantic system&#8217;s demand, its racial ideology, or its New World plantation economies.<\/p>\n<h2>The Creator&#8217;s Clarification and Subsequent Debate<\/h2>\n<p>Facing intense criticism, Karvellas posted a follow-up video more than a week later. She acknowledged that her initial comments had angered many but stood by a refined version of her claim. She clarified that she was specifically referring to the origins of slavery in the United States, not globally. To support this, she cited the case of Anthony Johnson, a man of African descent who arrived in Virginia as an indentured servant, gained his freedom, and eventually became a landowner and slaveholder himself.<\/p>\n<h3>Historical Nuance and the Anthony Johnson Case<\/h3>\n<p>Karvellas pointed to a 1655 Virginia court case where Johnson successfully sued to keep John Casor, a Black indentured servant, in lifelong servitude. Some interpretations view this as one of the earliest legal precedents in the English colonies for life-long, hereditary slavery based on race. However, historians caution against oversimplification. The African American Intellectual History Society (AAIHS) labeled Karvellas&#8217;s use of this narrative a &#8220;right-wing talking point.&#8221; They and other scholars note that the legal framework for chattel slavery was being built by the colonial assembly and English common law throughout the 17th century. Earlier cases, like that of John Punch in 1640\u2014a Black man sentenced to perpetual slavery alongside two white indentured servants who received finite sentences\u2014show the courts actively constructing racial distinctions in servitude.<\/p>\n<p>Experts argue that focusing on individual cases like Johnson&#8217;s distracts from the systemic nature of the institution. The development of American slavery was a top-down process driven by colonial elites and planters seeking a stable, exploitable labor force. It involved the gradual enactment of &#8220;slave codes&#8221; that stripped Africans and their descendants of legal rights, defined them as property, and made their status inheritable through the mother. While a tiny number of free Black people like Johnson did own slaves, they operated within and were ultimately subject to this white-dominated legal and economic system they did not create.<\/p>\n<h2>Online Reaction and Broader Implications<\/h2>\n<p>The online reaction to Karvellas&#8217;s videos was polarized but predominantly critical. Many commenters accused her of spreading dangerous historical falsehoods. &#8220;Controversial views = racism,&#8221; wrote one user succinctly. Others demanded she &#8220;educate yourself&#8221; or dismissed her claims as &#8220;loud and wrong.&#8221; Some defenders agreed with her interpretation, highlighting the complex and often uncomfortable fact that slavery was not a uniquely European or white practice, and that Africans participated in the slave trade. This defense, however, frequently conflated the existence of slavery in Africa with the creation of the specific, race-based transatlantic system.<\/p>\n<h3>The Dangers of Historical Simplification on Social Media<\/h3>\n<p>This incident underscores a persistent challenge in the digital age: the dissemination of simplified or distorted historical narratives on platforms designed for brevity and engagement. Complex, centuries-old historical processes are reduced to soundbites or used as rhetorical weapons in contemporary cultural debates. The case of Anthony Johnson, while a valuable historical data point, is often extracted from its full context to support a narrative that seeks to shift moral responsibility for the system of American slavery away from its primary architects and beneficiaries.<\/p>\n<h4>Media Literacy and Responsible Discourse<\/h4>\n<p>The controversy highlights the critical need for media literacy and historical education. Consumers of social media content must be equipped to question sweeping claims, seek out reputable sources, and understand the difference between an isolated historical anecdote and a systemic analysis. It also raises questions about platform accountability and the spread of content that can inflame racial tensions and propagate historical inaccuracies under the guise of &#8220;controversial opinion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>The Lasting Impact of Misinformation<\/h2>\n<p>Beyond the immediate online spat, debates like these have real-world consequences. Misconceptions about the nature and origins of slavery can fuel racial resentment, hinder productive conversations about historical legacy and present-day inequality, and provide intellectual cover for ideologies that seek to minimize the scale and impact of racial oppression. When history is weaponized for clicks or to provoke outrage, the nuanced truth is often the first casualty.<\/p>\n<p>The ongoing online argument over Karvellas&#8217;s statements is more than just another social media feud. It is a microcosm of a larger struggle over historical memory, narrative control, and the ways in which the past is invoked to make sense of\u2014or to deliberately obscure\u2014the complexities of the present. As these debates play out on TikTok, Twitter, and other forums, they remind us that understanding history requires patience, context, and a willingness to engage with uncomfortable truths in their full complexity, rather than seeking simplistic villains or absolving narratives in 60-second videos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A TikToker&#8217;s claim that Black people started slavery sparks outrage and debate, igniting discussions on racism and historical accuracy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":90448,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cards.overcentral.com\/cards\/en\/19998.png","fifu_image_alt":"New Jersey TikToker Faces Widespread Criticism After Claiming Black People Created Slavery","footnotes":""},"categories":[350],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19998","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-news"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cards.overcentral.com\/cards\/en\/19998.png","fifu_image_alt":"New Jersey TikToker Faces Widespread Criticism After Claiming Black People Created Slavery","fifu_redirection_url":"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/videos\/news\/have-you-seen\/2022\/06\/15\/new-jersey-tiktoker-delighted-newborn-fawn-her-patio\/7633587001\/","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19998","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19998"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19998\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/90448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19998"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19998"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/overcentral.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19998"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}